Dear
friends,
Recently,
Thailand’s
Juridical
Council
resolved
that the
Act
allowing
two-and
three-digit
lotteries
does not
exonerate
the
previous
government.
Instead
of that
Act,
this
government
intends
to amend
the 1974
Lottery
Act and
use it.
The
revised
Act will
oversee
legal
lottery
ticket
distribution,
but
first it
must be
approved
by the
National
Legislative
Assembly.
The
government
now
reconsidering
the
Lotteries
Act
causes
many
people
to
worry.
If it
revives
legal
lottery
sales,
many
problems
may
arise
which
the
existing
legislation
cannot
answer.
One of
the
primary
concerns
is how
to
prevent
the
lotteries
from
misleading
people,
especially
the poor,
whose
pockets
will be
even
emptier
as a
result
of the
lotteries.
Thus,
the
government
needs to
be very
careful
as it
reconsiders
this
sensitive
issue.
I argue
that the
government
should
avoid
misleading
the
public
in any
form. At
the same
time, I
also
understand
that
restricting
the
behavior
of
lottery
fans is
difficult
and
takes
time. It
is
impossible
to
eliminate
lotteries
in the
near
future
because
Thais
are by
nature
risk-takers
who hope
that by
investing
a little
money,
they
will
have a
chance
at
winning
big
money.
Lotteries
represent
a hope
that is
within
their
reach,
and some
people
see
gambling
in
lotteries
as less
risky
and
damaging
than
other
daily
activities
such as
having
an
accident,
experiencing
a
natural
disaster,
or
encountering
a
criminal.
Therefore,
if the
government
revives
lotteries,
I
propose
that it
revises
the form
that
lotteries
take. I
also
advocate
that the
government
refrain
from
viewing
lotteries
as
government
income.
Instead,
I
propose
that the
government
place
all
lottery
income
in a
long-term
trust
for the
benefit
of the
people,
something
that can
become a
long-term
security
for the
people.
In this
sense,
lottery
income
can help
strengthen
the
future
of our
people.
Use
lottery
money to
create
future
income.
The
government
can
introduce
a new
form of
lotteries,
for
example,
something
like
lottery-savings,
something
which
will
benefit
the
buyer
afterward.
But, in
this
case,
the
reward
is not
100% of
the
income
but for
receiving
income
from
lottery
will be
put as a
saving
for
lottery
buyer in
the
future .
Re-stipulate
the
distribution
of
lottery
income.
Lottery
monies
can be
divided
into 3
types.
First,
some
money
will be
used as
prizes.
Second,
some
money
will be
returned
to each
buyer as
savings
to be
used
when
they
retire.
The
third
portion
would be
sent to
the
Ministry
of
Finance,
where it
would be
used to
provide
welfare
for all
Thai
citizens.
Assign
financial
institutes
as
hosts.
The new-form
of
lotteries
would be
based on
the
concept
of
helping
lottery
players
increase
their
savings.
This
would
mean
that
government
financial
institutes
such as
the
Government
Savings
Bank
would
manage
the
lottery-savings.
Lottery
retailers
may be
allowed
to take
the
lotteries
winnings
from the
financial
institute
and
distribute
them,
provided
the
retailers
will
properly
collect
the
buyers’
information
and
honestly
manage
the
saving
accounts
for
them.
Decrease
the
values
of the
top
prizes
but
increase
the
number
of
prizes
so there
will be
more
winners.
If the
government
wants to
retain
lotteries,
it
should
considering
the
values
of the
prizes.
Rather
than
letting
lotteries
gain
increasingly
higher
top
prize
values,
thereby
attracting
new
lottery
players,
it
should
adjust
the
values
of the
prizes,
so more
people
will win
something,
even if
the
amount
is
rather
moderate.
This
would
decrease
the
hyper
attention
that the
huge
prize
money
attracts.
We must
bring
this
proposed
Act into
the
National
Legislative
Assembly
for
debate
before
any
further
decisions
are
made.
The
government
itself
should
study
how to
prevent
the
grievous
consequences
that
lotteries
have and
how to
stipulate
reformat
lotteries
to
decrease
and
eventually
end all
types of
gambling. |